Sunday, November 09, 2008

wave of naive optimism

Back in the early days of this blog, it was hardly tied into the British blogosphere at all; if you look at the 2003-2004 archives it's just stuffed with US presidential politics, and most of its earliest supporters came from the US. Which is ironic given its distinctive Europhile taste, I suppose. That started to change around 2005 because some bugger here started reading it, in essence.

Anyway, largely because of this, I'm very pleased for this blog's friends there - Laura Rozen, Kathryn Cramer, Soj, Jordan Barab, the Nielsen Haydens, hardindr, minnesota, God knows how many Kos screen names, Steve Gilliard - that they've been vindicated right down the line. The netroots phenomenon wasn't a nine days' wonder. The Internet is not a naturally conservative medium, and PowerLine isn't blog of the year any more. You don't have to support the invasion of Iraq or be smeared as unpatriotic - or rather, they'll do it but it only matters if you alter course as a result.

It wasn't necessary to get the support of David Broder et al - no bugger reads him anyway. Hillary Clinton wasn't destined to win. Young voters weren't actually certain not to turn out. Organising-first tactics worked. The working class isn't a bunch of racist idiots. A fuel tax holiday actually was a stupid, cash-draining, oil-guzzling, climate-hammering piece of vacuous demagogy, not a brilliant electoral gambit. Rudy Giuliani and Fox News were paper tigers. The wingnutosphere was actually just a bunch of drivelling maniacs. The October Surprise was a flop. Even the racist gun nuts didn't deliver. Your actual redistribution isn't politically toxic.

Howard Dean was a great choice to run the Democratic National Committee. The 50 state strategy wasn't insanely grandiose. Social Security privatisation wasn't the test of seriousness. The war and the torture and the bungling and the corruption weren't obscure nonsense. And I think the bloggers can take a bow on those three. So much of the political background of this campaign goes back to that desperate period after the 2004 election when some people thought John Kerry too radical and others decided to try harder.

Did I mention that the official Murdoch candidate didn't make it to the starting line? Yes, I did; when was the last time that a major political candidate who had the backing of News Corporation - and first Giuliani and then McCain did - lost? You don't have to give in.


Gridlock said...

I may have mentioned this here before, but you have to read this:

to understand Obama's grasp of how this election was going to play for him.

I'm very much with Chris Floyd, WhoisIOZ, Dennis Perrin, Arthur Silber et al in my apathy (verging on hostility) towards both candidates but at least we have a President (elect - 75 days to go, lots can happen... etc) who not only uses computers but who understands that Marc Andresson is a guy to talk to, rather than some MS lobbyist.

Gridlock said...

Is it wrong that the most promising thing about an Obama presidency to me is that he uses a mac and watches The Wire, smoked pot in college and plays poker?

Alex said...

Well, I remember when Tony Blair seemed normal. But GWB apparently sent 2 e-mail messages in his term of office; Her Majesty the Queen sent half as many as that *before 1980*.

kostenloser Counter