tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5467119.post8821432929168959995..comments2023-10-24T10:09:22.146+01:00Comments on The Yorkshire Ranter: The IPCC ReportAlexhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17153530634675543954noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5467119.post-30889730396397637312007-11-09T12:20:00.000+01:002007-11-09T12:20:00.000+01:00It's actually worse than I thought:"Alteration of ...It's actually worse than I thought:<BR/><BR/>"Alteration of the surveillance log<BR/>20.111 There is no doubt that the surveillance log has been altered. That would<BR/>not have occurred if the investigation had been referred to the IPCC<BR/>immediately and in accordance with the practice that had been<BR/>established during the previous fifteen months of the existence of the<BR/>IPCC. The alteration totally changes the context of the entry from ‘I<BR/>believed it was NT’ to ‘and I believed it was not NT’. The significance of<BR/>this cannot be over stated. The evidence obtained by the IPCC does not<BR/>make it possible to establish with any certainty who was responsible for<BR/>the alteration. However, it is possible to infer that a clear motive lay<BR/>behind the alteration. The investigation has not found sufficient<BR/>evidence against any individual to make it possible to suggest that<BR/>criminal proceedings might be appropriate."<BR/><BR/>tr: "You covered it up but we can't nail you for it becuase we can't prove which of you did it." Blair must go.<BR/><BR/>Chris WilliamsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com